On some pictures of the moon’s surface you can see what is plainly a “C” on a Moon Rock. NASA says that the “C” did not appear on the “original” photograph but was an artifact from various copies. Some say it was a hair on the lens and others say it proves the rock is a fake. In film making directors, or who ever is responsible, for placing props on the scene often put letters or numbers on the prop for placement. Sooo could this be a prop or a hair on the reproduction? You decide…..

There are so many more anomalies that are evident such as:
*The Shadows of objects in some NASA photos don’t line up
*The view of the Earth is a perfect circle. The Earth, I was taught, was more oblong then circular due to the gravitational pull of the moon
*The absense of a blast crater under the lander.
*The Absense of Moon Dust on the Lunar Lander Pads.
*Sometimes the Astronauts are in shadow of the Lunar Lander but the picture shows them in the light

Just because we explore the alternate theories to the Moon landing of the late 60’s and early 70’s doesn’t mean they didn’t happen.  The reader is encouraged not to take the official chain of events as fact as well as not to take what we present here as Gospel but to do their own research and come to their own conclusions.

A Gallup poll in 1999 showed that 6% of Americans said they thought the lunar landings were fake, and 5% said they were undecided.